Category: Novedades

Within the International Civil Society Week that will be developed in Serbia from April 6^th to 12^th, RACI hosted a parallel event that not only reproduced the schedule that will be worked in the official event, but also produced the inputs  that are going to be taken into account for the delegations from the different countries.

With the objective of producing tools and process, the network reunited representatives from different sectors with the purpose of creating a space for debate and for the proposal of potential solutions in four areas that affect CSO beyond the topics worked: Sustainability, Transparency, Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) and Enabling Environment.

The event started with a panel of experts that presented a brief analysis of the situation on each of the topics. It was integrated by Karina Kalpschtrej, Institutional Strengthen Director of Poder Ciudadano; Carlos March, Strategic Communication Director of AVINA Foundation; Mariano de Donatis, Director of Health Without Harm International and Tamar Hahn, Director of the Center of Information of United Nations (CINU).

As part of this initiative, members of RACI will travel to the official event hosted in Serbia where it will be shared the materials, the processes and the conclusions worked in Buenos Aires, thanks to the support of CIVICUS and the Embassy of Canada.

International Civil Society Week is an international event designed so that civil society creates ties, debates and solutions jointly.  Employing a common approach, organizations have united their resources to summon an international group of multiple leaders of civil society with the objective of sharing ideas, impulse a positive social change, exchange tools that improve citizen action and celebrate the citizen power. Every ICSW explore a specific topic in an exhaustive way.

We are facing the age of “digitalization”, a process in constant expansion that includes and modifies more and more areas and fields – being the most prominent and well-known the transformation of financial and capital markets. The impact of digitalization in these markets, without a doubt, is easy to detect. For example, it is proven that digital financing could increase the GDP of emerging economies by USD$3.7 billion by 2025.

However, when we speak of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the objectives of the Paris Agreement over climate change, it becomes more difficult to find answers to the many questions that arise around how to take advantage of this technological disruption in order to guarantee the proper financing of these objectives.

To tackle this issue, it was created the Task Force on Digital Financing, which not only seeks for the best way to make use of “digitalization” – specially in topics related to “digital finance” or Finetech – in order to finance the above mentioned objectives, but also seeks to catalyze the opportunities that arise around this and mitigate any type of risk associated with it.

FINETECH: digital potentials with real impacts

Finetech could help to ensure that funding decisions take into account more environmental and social externalities: from climate risk to community impacts and labor standards. A clear example is how crowdsourcing is used to finance, through the use of mobile payment systems, the distribution of solar technology, which becomes more accessible to the poorest communities.

However, the digitalization of finances can have serious disadvantages. Among them, it stresses the automatization of funding decisions, risking the systematic exclusion of the poorest borrowers or insurers, the most at risk or simply the unusual ones.

Like any new tool, it is necessary to think of all the externalities and consequences both positive and negative that can apply. Digitalization could increase the transparency of financial decisions, but it could also open new opportunities for illicit financial flows. Currently, it requires a process of analysis in order to promote positive impacts and reduce negative impacts.

How to advance towards financial digitalization with positive impacts?

To encourage the positive aspects and mitigate the disadvantages of digital financing, there will be needed policies, regulations and standards, together with the technology and innovation of the market. However, nowadays, the first generation of rules that govern digital finance relate principally to financial stability and consumer protection. Still, there is much to be done, especially in the area that relates finetech with sustainable development.

To finance the sustainable development: to understand and to improve finetech, an exercise for Digital Task Force on Financing

The Secretary General of the United Nations understands perfectly the importance of securing the funding for the 2030 Agenda. To do this, a strategy was formally launched to finance the 2030 Agenda in the 2018 General Assembly of the United Nations. The central pillar of the strategy is digital financing, followed by related areas of international finance and economic policy and support to member states in order to advance national plans to fund sustainable development. The SDG’s Task Force on Digital Financing is the vehicle that has been chosen to advance the understanding of this technology and take it into practice.

This group will work to address three basic questions over 18 months:

1. What opportunity does the financial digitalization of different aspects of the 2030 Agenda offer?
2. What barriers exist and how can we take advantage of the opportunities and possible inconveniences of digitalization? In what way and what means exist to overcome and mitigate them?
3. Who should do what in the public and private sectors, where is action is needed, at both the local and international level (what should be the key roles for the UN itself)?

Beyond thinking, planning, and suggesting what can be done about SDG funding, the Task Force will search for a multitude of actors and diverse innovations that will keep the agenda going long after they have completed their own work.

Finetech will open many new ways to catalyze funding for the 2030 Agenda, and it will create challenges that will be needed to be addressed through collective action,n in order to achieve political objectives. The working group provides a unique opportunity to understand and shape these results as they arise before they are consolidated into new standards.

For more information, visit: https://www.brookings.edu/blog/future-development/2019/02/11/financing-sustainable-development-is-fintech-the-solution-problem-or-irrelevant/.

During the process of the G20, hosted in Japan, RACI had the pleasure of being invited by the Civil Affinity Group 20 to lead, once again, the workgroup Local2Global.

To carry out her participation, Juliana Catania, RACI´s deputy director, traveled to Japan where she exercised the international coordination of the group and also focused in the conversations that were takin place in the online forum available for all the organization, so the ones that wanted to participate could do it without any geographical barriers

The main objective of this groupwork is: generate more knowledge and participation of the CSO of all over the world in the mechanism of participation and defense of the G20; democratize the access to this type of key spaces in the public policies and strengthen the CSO of the world in order to achieve a continuous and meaningful participation in all the future meeting of G20.

Among the main topics discussed we find:

• Establishing the right to free expression and association of citizens and CSO in national and world politics.
• The importance of enabling and defending a free space for the civic participation and action.
• State of the proper environment for the participation of the CSO in the world.
• Participation of the local and regional CSO on global topics.
• Relevance of the CSO to achieve the SDG.

Some of RACI´s members also participated of the event, such as “Fundación Huesped”, represented by Kurt Frieder, who officiated as International Coordinator of the Health group, and “Fundación SES”, represented by Marcela Browne, who officiated as International Coordinator of the Education group.

With the objective of stablishing the foundations of what will be de C20 summit on April 21, 22 and 23, every participant of the meeting in Japan had the possibility to witness the “Face to Face” meeting, where it were discussed some key topics, like the preparation of the policy papers, and where participants also had the possibility to stablish conversations with G20 representatives about anticorruption, development, digital economy, environment and energy, work, finance, health, commerce and infrastructure.

The C20 Summit will be performed in Tokyo, Japan. For more information visit: https://civil-20.org/.

As a member of AGNA, RACI was invited to participate of the activity “Planning of Transformative Scenarios”, which took place in South Africa between February 24th and March 3^rd. AGNA is the Affinity Group of National Associations which take place within the framework of CIVICUS, the global alliance of organization and activist whose main objective is strengthen the networks of the world civil society.

Through the work days, RACI was able to participate in an activity of planning that implied thinking about the future of the organizations in a strategic and participative way. The main objective of this activity was the collective work, which means to evaluate and project the future in a joint way. That is why this innovative strategy of planning can be used for the projection of a diversity of scenarios, from the future of the society in general, to the future of an organization in particular.

A matter of key importance for our network is that RACI was the network chosen as model to apply this methodology and analyze the future projection during the whole training week. This means that African, Asian and Middle East leaders worked over a strategic planning for RACI. This is an element of crucial importance for the network, because it gave us the opinion of experts from other parts of the world about the process applied and suggestions that we can incorporate. The final results obtained at the end of this process will become inputs that will be analyzed for RACI´s Strategy Planning for 2025.

From RACI, we believe that the future is built collectively. That is why everything learnt in South Africa gave us the framework of the planning process that is initiating the network. In that sense, it should be noted that part of the methodology learnt was used during the Local and International Assessor Council and will be applied to future meetings with other actors.

In the summary of the International Center for Not-for-Profit Law of May 2018, the topic “Effective donor Responses to the challenge of the closure of civic spaces” was discussed. It can be observed that of the legal initiatives, proposed or promulgated, which restrict the freedoms of association or meeting, 47% restrict the training, registration, or functioning of OSC; 28% restrict OCS’s ability to receive international funding; and another 25% restricts peaceful assembly.

Within the new trends that have been observed, we can find:

• Digital Restrictions: Indonesia, Pakistan, and Tanzania, for example, have adopted cybercrime laws and other regulations that allow the monitor of electronic communications without restrictions.
• Restrictions related to transparency: (1) burdensome requirements to inform and disclose private information (for example in Bulgaria, Panama, and Uganda); (2) obligatory disclosure of private assets of OSC directors and/or officials (for example, Ukraine and India); (3) limiting public promotion by categorizing OSC as lobbyists or political activists (for example, in the UK and Ireland); (4) disclosure of private and international funders (for example, in Hungary and Mexico); y (5) disproportionate penalties related to non-compliance with the requirements of information and disclosure (for example, in Egypt and Russia).
• Denying OSC access to multilateral platforms: The OSC and defenders of human rights are subject to increasing threats, intimidation, and reprisal when they try to speak in multilateral platforms.
• Discrediting the voice of OSC in multilateral platforms: NGO’s organized by the government participate in multilateral platforms like the UN Human Rights Council. They defend countries’ policies, try to delegitimize the voices of genuine civil society, and use up time, space, and other limited resources.
• Prevent freedom of movement: This consists of preventing civil society representatives from traveling abroad.
• Narrowing the space and capacity for International NGOs: For example, through restrictions on spending, the NGO’s mission, or registration.
• Stigmatizing donors: For example, the Hungarian government has been carrying out a campaign aimed at the Open Society Foundation and the Central European University, as well as its founder, George Soros.

The origins of civil space repression date back to the start of the current millennium. Throughout the 1990’s, the OSC enjoyed a largely positive reputation in the international community. The OSC made important contributions to health, education, culture, economic development, and a series of other beneficial objectives for the public. As a reflection of this, in September of 2000, the UN General Assembly adopted the Millennium Declaration. There, it was emphasized the importance of human rights and the value of “non-governmental organizations and civil society in general”.

The specific driving force that restricts the space or capacity for civil society varies from one country to another, in accordance with the government and the political leaders and how they act with a variety of motivations. At the same time, one can identify various driving forces that have resulted in global repression against civil society:

• The dramatic growth and the demonstrated power of civil society and civil society organizations during the 1990’s;
• The growing priority given to anti-terrorism and national security by all the governments in the world;
• A change in the relations of global power, that have reduced the influence of Western governments and traditional multilateral institutions and have given rise to challenges for the liberal democratic model;
• The growing collusion between political elites and economics in order to protect their interests without any oversight or criticism,
• The increase of ideological and religious extremism that result in increasingly hostile environments for the defenders of vulnerable groups, including those that represent women, LGBTQIA, minorities, and others.

Over the past few years, various countries have faced an increase in intolerant political populism. These populist movements can be seen as a signal for a bigger reduction of civic space, even in established democracies. This can encourage authoritarian governments to further restrict civil society.

As we are likely to be at the cusp of a new wave of restrictions on civil society, the commitment of donor governments, as credible and principles-based voices on issues of civic space, is more important than ever.

For more information, visit:

https://oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/closing-civic-space-trends-drivers-and-what-donors-can-do-about-it/.

After four years of work with partner organizations in Latin America and the Caribbean, the RACI team traveled to Mexico for what was the official launch of Innovation for Change.

The event was held in Mexico City on November 15 and 16 as part of a meeting attended by over one hundred guests representing the private sector, public and civil society, from more than 30 countries.

The launch included recreational instances, trainings and co-creation dynamics that promoted partnership work and forged new collaborative relationships for the future. All the activities of the meeting remained framed in the strategic axis of sustainability traversed by philanthropic actors, companies and technology.

During the two days of work the guests were able to experience typical shows of the Mexican culture, listen to high level panelists and elaborate projects that were then presented to be financed by small donation programs aimed at innovation in the region. The topics stipulated for the development of these proposals were: Citizen mobilization for social change, new economic models, sustainability of organizations, digital security, transparency and accountability, anti-corruption, defense and promotion of Human Rights, and civic technology.

Innovation for Change is a global network of people and organizations that want to connect, associate and learn together to defend and strengthen the civic space. The network has more than 5,000 members and regional centers in 7 sub-regions of the world.

The mission is to strengthen civil society organizations and support them to be self-sustaining and innovative. Diversity is part of the essence of the initiative and, together with all the members, the center organizes different instances of collaborative work such as innovation laboratories, hackathons, digital security training, fundraising workshops, among others.

Within the framework of the visits made by RACI to learn more about its partner organizations, the Legislative Directory Foundation made a very special invitation: visit the National Congress.

But this time we do not want to tell the experience by ourselves but we asked Natalia Pérez León, a volunteer from the RACI team, to tell us how she lived this outing.

The visits organized by RACI within the framework of interns and volunteers’ program are usually held at the headquarters of the Members of the Network. But the November 2018 visit was very special: the first visit of RACI to the Argentine National Congress, with the Legislative Directory Foundation, and my first approach to parliamentary dynamics in South America.

It was an exciting journey from the beginning for the beauty of the building and its interiors – made partially by the creator of the emblematic Teatro Colón -, visiting both chambers while being guided with the double exposition of the official guide of the National Congress and the Foundation guide. This allowed to draw the details that constitute the parliamentary dynamics, making possible the discussion and adoption of laws representative of the popular will. Without it being a perfect system, it is admirable that it works today despite the ups and downs that Argentine democratic history has had.

Accessibility to the Legislative Power – either through guided or institutional visits such as the offered by the Foundation and RACI – is vital for the formation of values within the people in the territory of any country. Bearing in mind that many of the volunteers in RACI are foreigners, we must remember that we are subject to the laws of this country – whether as tourists or residents – and therefore we are also interested in the functioning of the democratic institutions of this nation.

I greatly appreciate having made this visit, not having had the same possibility in my country of origin. Thus, the exchange we make through RACI helps to reinforce those civic values that every State needs for its better future, even from the small scale of a volunteering program.

We want to thank the Executive Director of the Legislative Board, Noel Alonso Murray for guiding the whole visit and Natalia for sharing her experience with us and for the great work she does in RACI.

Last December 3^rd, the ceremony of the handover of the affinity group Civil 20 took place in the Instituto del Servicio Exterior de la Nacion. The organization Poder Ciudadano in its role of Chair and RACI as the Co Chair of the C20 handed formally the representation of the group to the Japanese organization that will preside during 2019.

Yuka Iwatsvki, president of ACE (Action against Child Explotation), assumed her responsibility as Chair during the presidency of the G20 in Japan. On the other hand, Masaki Inaba will be Sherpa of the Civil 20, taking the lead delegated by Maria Emilia Berazategui who occupied the role in Argentina.

The event was done with the accompaniment of the Organizations of Civil Society that worked arduously during the whole process of the creation and presentation of the recommendations given to the leaders of states. Also, there was a high-level panel in which the Sherpa of the G20, Pedro Villagra Delgado, and the Deputy of the Finance Track, Laura Jaitman, evaluated the unfolding of Argentina in its most relevant international event, the positioning that the event meant for the country, and the lessons learned after a year of cross sectional alliances under the scope of the world.

The year ends and the organizations start to plan which will be the following steps in 2019. New ideas, responsibility distribution, and drafting of possible projects are some of the activities that keep the teams busy during the OSC. In this entry, we will share some tips and suggestions from the RACI´s International Cooperation guide to take into account when thinking and writing a proposal for a donor.

A project is a systematic way of offering a response to a problem identified as such and each of the projects start from the analysis of reality in order to identify the problems that affect a community or group. Once we identify an specific issue, it is important to take into account that the problem must NOT be express as a lack of something. On the other hand, it is necessary to reflect on what needs to be change, questioning and thinking of possible causes and consequences of the proposed change.

Once stated the problem, it is important to determine the general and specific goals. The general goal relates to the aim of the project: the aimed effect; the specific goals relate to the divergent effects that the projects need to achieve in order to guarantee the desire impact.

The goals must be written in plain language, be brief and concrete, be realist and feasible and be written in infinitive.

From the goals, the aims and activities of the project are detached. The aims must express the achievement that one is seeking with the implementation of the project in the given time. Thus, the fulfillment of the goals must be measurable. On the other hand, the activities are necessary to achieve each of the specific goals. In this section, it is recommendable to do a draft of the schedule of activities.

During this part of the process, it is necessary to take into account the risks, in other words, any external factor that the organization cannot control and that may affect the implementation of the project.

The expected results are the goals achieved after ending a process. They must be quantifiable and their measurement must be done using criteria focused on: quantity, quality, and time. Also, they have to relate to the activities, general, and specific goals. It is recommended to make sure that:

• The main results to fulfill the specific goals are included.
• The results are feasible.
• Each result is a mean to achieve the goals.
• The goals are defined correctly and in a verifiable way.

When talking about indicator, we are referring to the specifics steps of progress achieved during the fulfillment of the aims. There are three categories:

• Impact indicators: they measure the expected changes.
• Effect indicators: they measure the changes that will take place.
• Fulfillment indicators: they measure whether the aims have been achieved or not.

Regarding the sources for verification, these are the means to know and verify the fulfillment of the stated aims. Primary (they relate to people) or secondary (they relate to data, places or documents) sources can be used.

Finally, the evaluation of the project is a programmed activity of reflection about the action based on systematic procedures of recollection, analysis and interpretation of information, with the aim to issue subjective, communicable and argumentative judgment on the activities, results and impacts of the project, and to formulate recommendations in order to make decisions to adapt the present action and better any future steps. It is extremely important to start the instance of evaluation previous the implementation of the project so one can know that the resources needed are available, whether the information needed is clear and to analyze the context in which the project will take place. An evaluation during the middle of the implementation is also recommendable as it helps to avoid any situation that may risk the project and, therefore, recalculate the process. Lastly, the final evaluation when ending the project will show which actions and process must be conserved and implemented in the future and which strategic decision must be change in order to avoid mistakes.

If you want to know more about how to submit a project, you can download the International Cooperation guide in our Virtual Library.

The Official Development Assistance, as grants or loans, is limited. Donors are worried about how to assign resources efficiently. How to assign resources is an issue of concern among scholars; international relations and politics have been useful for the creation of assignment models of economic assistance.

However, academic models do not answer the questions that donors face when choosing beneficiaries. For instance, some ask whether one should assist fragile or undeveloped countries… If the fragility of the state is a consequence of the government, should one help anyways?

When answering these questions a new focus on the Official Development Assistance is used. Instead of analyzing the impact of help in the reduction of poverty, the economy of goods framework is used to measure the consumer’s surplus of the beneficiary.  What is more, the surplus of the consumer is determined as the difference between the marginal price of the international exchange in the country and the price that the country pays for the help. It is possible to measure this because, contrary to previous years, the developing countries have a public credits rating.

The essay infers that the cost of international loans relates to the credit scores from the perspective of the classification agencies. Based on this, the authors build a model in order to estimate the relation between the credit classification and different economic variables.

The results of the model are used in two ways: to predict credit classification for those countries which do not have them and to infer the importance of each variable (such as per capita income, the government score, the levels of debt, and so on).

Taking into account the essay, it is possible to say that, in general, more help should go to poor countries and to those with good governments. Also, the results promote the help to small islands and under develop countries with economic volatility.

Naturally, expanding economic help to some countries implies fewer funds for others.  However, there are other loans from bilateral and multilateral institutions that may help those countries adversely affected.

If you want to read more about this topic, you can do it in www.brookings.edu